Cosmogenic · Open Question · The Poll
Document XV — Response Layer

Seven problems.
Do you think they're real?

We are not asking for agreement with our solution. We are not asking for funding or endorsement. We are asking one question per problem: do you believe this is actually happening? Tell us where you disagree — specifically.

On the integrity of this data: We don't verify. We don't filter bots. We don't clean what you see here. What you see is the world responding — messy, scared, hopeful, manipulated, genuine, all of it at once. That's not a bug. A coordinated response looks different from a distributed one. We're showing you both. You decide.
responses recorded · updated in real time
The Seven Problems · Your Assessment
Problem 01
Value extraction at infrastructure scale

When a large tech company builds a data centre in your area, the electricity bill lands locally and the profits leave. Your community hosts it. Someone else owns it. We’ve seen this pattern before — with oil, with quarrying, with the power stations. Same infrastructure, same story.

—% agree —% disagree —% unsure
— responses
Problem 02
Algorithmic capture of attention

The apps most people use to talk to each other are built to keep you scrolling, not to help you think. That’s not an accident — it’s how they make money. When communities try to organise, discuss, or decide something together, they’re doing it on tools designed to distract them.

—% agree —% disagree —% unsure
— responses
Problem 03
AI built to keep taking

AI is built from everything people have ever written, said, made, and shared. The moment you put something into the system — a message, a photo, a conversation — it becomes raw material. The communities whose words and knowledge feed it have no claim on what gets built from them. That’s not a bug in the current system. It’s how the current system is designed to work.

—% agree —% disagree —% unsure
— responses
Problem 04
Energy geography ignored

Scotland has some of the best wind and tidal energy in the world. The data centres and AI infrastructure being built right now are not going there. They’re going where the land is cheapest and the tax breaks are biggest. The places with the energy advantage are being overlooked.

—% agree —% disagree —% unsure
— responses
Problem 05
No proof-of-concept for the alternative

People have been arguing for years that there’s a better way to build digital infrastructure — owned by communities, not corporations. But there’s no working example anyone can actually visit, examine, or copy. Until there is, it stays an idea. Ideas without proof don’t change policy.

—% agree —% disagree —% unsure
— responses
Problem 06
The broken green contract

Most people in the UK already pay a premium on their energy bills to fund renewable infrastructure. Most people support the transition to clean energy. But the infrastructure being built with that money — the data centres, the grid connections, the compute — isn’t being built for the communities paying for it. The consent was given. The money left. The benefit is not coming back yet and we are being asked to give more.

—% agree —% disagree —% unsure
— responses
Question 07
The ask

Should we take the small window of opportunity to pause and at least weigh up the options and see if we can provide a better future for the bairns?

—% agree —% disagree —% unsure
— responses
One last thing · Optional

Where are you joining us from?

Earth. Who named it. The garden where the mycelium grows.

A postcode, a city, a country, a continent — or Planet Earth. Any granularity is welcome. This is for the map, not the record. Your votes are already counted. We're just rather glad you're here.

We don't have a dropdown. You decide what to call where you're from.
Skip — I'd rather not say
  Your responses have been recorded.
Response geography
Every dot is someone who chose to be here

Something more to say?

The temperature check above is signal. If you have a specific objection — a flaw in the architecture, a better solution, a reason one of these problems isn't real — that belongs in a conversation, not a toggle.

The Matrix room is where that happens. Your name on it. Your reasoning in the record. Serious critique gets forked into the VRS permanently, with attribution. Under the accord.

→ Join the conversation